Pronoun-Antecedent Agreement With Examples

Ex redesigned: Psychologists must carefully check medical records before making a diagnosis. (This type of displacement is the most common problem that authors have when it comes to reconciling pronouns personally with their ancestors.) On the other hand, if we actually refer to the people who have the group, we look at the plural noun. In this case, we use a reference plural pronoun. The only problem that most authors have with the problems with which it is confused with one that looks like a possessive, but that is really the contraction for whom it is. In the same way that we should not confuse his is with him (the contraction is for him or he has), we should not confuse who is with whom. Ex fake: A teacher should always write comments on his tasks noted. (This example is false because it assumes that teachers are men.) Ex fake: A teacher should always write comments on their rated tasks. (This example is wrong, because trying to correct the number has caused a problem with the agreement of numbers – the teacher is singular and there is plural.) Revised ex: A teacher should always write comments on his or her noted tasks. Teachers should always write comments on their rated tasks. We don`t talk and we don`t write like that. The Nominus Lincoln is automatically replaced with a pronoun. Of course, we say that pronouns that refer to the same name or name should not move from person to person during a discussion. If the sex of a precursor is not clear or unknown, pronouns should not be automatically returned to one or both sexes.

For example, not all doctors are male or female nurses. Although this is not in itself unification, gender sensitivity sometimes leads to some of them, most often in numbers. The need for a pronoun-ante agreement can lead to gender problems. If, for example, you would write, “A student must see his or her counsellor before the end of the semester,” if there are student students, there is only mourning. In this situation, we can pluralize to avoid the problem: we must replace the noun of male and singular subject John with the pronoun of the male subject, singular and masculine. We can replace the unique female object name, female, with a single female object pronoun. In the examples above, C and D are the most difficult, because precursors have both a singular noun and a plural noun. Think of these two guidelines . . . .

Keep in mind these three important points on pronoun preceding the agreement, if a group nostantif is the precursor: My is unique to agree with the individual precursor, I.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.